How Does Ancient Rome’s Voting System Compare to Modern Democracy?

Ancient Rome had a voting system that was kind of like a big group game where people chose leaders, and modern democracy is like when you get to pick your favorite candy from a bag, but with more rules.

Like a Big Group Game

In Ancient Rome, some people got to vote, mostly men who owned land. They would gather in a forum, which was kind of like a big open square where everyone could see each other. When they voted, they used little pieces of pottery or stones, it was like using tokens to pick their favorite leader.

Like Picking Your Favorite Candy

In modern democracy, people vote on things like who should be president, and almost everyone gets to take part. You go to a polling station, which is like a candy store where you choose your favorite treat, but instead of candy, you choose a person or idea. The only difference is that now we use paper ballots or computers to count the votes, instead of counting tokens.

Both systems are about making choices together, it's just that modern democracy has more people playing the game!

Take the quiz →

Examples

  1. A Roman citizen votes by raising their hand in the Forum, while a modern voter uses a ballot paper at a polling station.
  2. In Ancient Rome, only male citizens could vote; today, people of all ages and genders can participate in elections.
  3. Rome's Senate made big decisions, much like how today’s Parliament or Congress passes laws.

Ask a question

See also

Discussion

Recent activity